In its present form, the Rule requires that in order to delist its securities from the NYSE a domestic company must:
- provide actual written notice to at least its 35 largest shareholders of record and issue a press release announcing the delisting proposal;
- delay delisting for 20 to 60 business days from the later of the written notice or the press release; and
- obtain the approval of the audit committee, in addition to the approval of the issuer's board.
- the Rule is a relic of another era that serves no legitimate investor protection purpose in today's market;
- the Rule's shareholder notice provisions and the requirement of audit committee approval are not consistent with the principles of shareholder democracy and corporate governance espoused by the Commission; and
- the Rule is antithetical to the free and open competition that the Commission has consistently advanced and that is the bedrock of the U.S. capital markets system.
The Commission chose to wait and see if the July 1999 revisions to Rule 500 resolved the Commission's long-standing concerns with the Rule's anti-competitive effects before taking further action. The Commission invited reconsideration of the Rule "on an ongoing basis."
As the petition notes, there is no longer a remotely tenable argument that investors need to be protected from a company's business decision to list its stock on a securities market other then the NYSE. Among the arguments cited are the following:
- the separation of the NASDAQ market from its regulator, NASD, assures the integrity of our (NASDAQ's) regulatory process;
- according to SEC-mandated data (11Ac1-5) analyzed by outside firms, when compared with traditional exchanges that direct order flow into a floor-based, specialist structure, NASDAQ's decentralized structure of multiple dealers competing for order flow gives investors faster execution speeds, superior quoted spreads, and lower transaction costs; and
- NASDAQ's listing standards are easier to understand, more protective of investors, administered more transparently and enforced more consistently than those of the NYSE.