Since 2003, the European Commission has adopted several EU Regulations endorsing international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS) as well as amendments to existing and previously endorsed standards. This legal framework of endorsed IFRSs provides issuers with various options for the preparation of their consolidated financial statement. This CESR statement is therefore especially relevant during the transition phase where the effect of the preparers’ options is likely to have the most significant impacts on the financial presentation and results of the companies. CESR underlines that in implementing IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements paragraphs 108 and seq., reporting entities must disclose a summary of significant accounting policies. This requirement is very important and should include all information that enables investors to have a clear and complete picture on the use of the various options mentioned below, including those resulting from the EU endorsement process. CESR has identified four specific situations where transparent disclosure will be relevant, in particular for the first annual reporting under IFRS which, in most situations, will be the 2005 annual financial statements.
- Firstly, the endorsed IAS/IFRS themselves provide several options, in particular on first time adoption of IFRS, between two or more recognition methods and measurement bases. The standards themselves include specific disclosure requirements which have to be followed, notably on the use of options.
- Secondly, there are areas that are not currently specifically dealt with under IFRSs (e.g. accounting for service concession arrangements, emission rights, puts on minority interests…). A transparent disclosure explaining the accounting treatment selected would provide meaningful information to the users of the financial statements (see IAS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, paragraph 10 and seq.).
- Thirdly, particular situations may arise where IAS/IFRS have not been fully endorsed for application in the EU. This is currently the case for some of the provisions of IAS 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) that are directly related to the accounting treatment of portfolio hedging. These provisions have not been adopted for mandatory use in the EU pursuant to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2086/2004 of 19 November 2004 (the so-called “carve out” of IAS 392). It can therefore be expected that a number of companies will choose to apply the full version of IAS 39, while others may apply the amended standard endorsed by the EU. As it is likely that companies will use different accounting approaches in the area of hedge accounting and effectiveness, issuers should be transparent in explaining their policies and all the more so where the “carve out” is used.
- Finally, there is always a time lag between the issue of IFRS by the IASB and their mandatory application in the EU as a result of the EU endorsement process. The European Commission recently informed Member States that Regulations endorsing IFRS published in the Official Journal and entering into force after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are signed, can be used by companies (but they are not obliged to) where early application is permitted in the Regulation and the related IFRS. It is important for issuers to provide disclosure if they choose to apply standards before they legally enter into force (when allowed). Furthermore, IAS 8 also requires additional disclosure from entities that have not applied a new Standard or Interpretation that has been issued but is not yet effective (IAS 8, paragraph 30).
Finally it should be noted that this CESR statement does not modify the recommendation published by CESR in December 2003 for additional guidance regarding the transition to IFRS (ref CESR/03- 323e).
(1) The expression was approved by Commission and ARC (see the news headlines and draft summary record of the
ARC meeting of 30.11.2005 at : http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/accounting/news)
(2) Refer to FAQ published by EC on 11/19/2004 which provides further explanation on the meaning and scope of
"carve out"